Strategy 06 · Perpetuals

Exposure with Managed Risk

More of a trade, with the loss decided first.

Funding capture is what the perpetuals book does most of the time. It is not the only thing perpetuals are for. When the desk has a view it wants more of, a spot position it is building, a spread between two venues or two terms, or an outcome it has priced elsewhere in the book, a perpetual adds that exposure in one contract, on one venue, without moving more capital to do it. What makes this a strategy rather than a bet is that the size of the position is decided from the loss the desk is prepared to take, before the position exists.

When perpetuals add exposure

A spot position being accumulated over days can be pre-positioned in perpetuals and rolled into spot as fills arrive, so that the desk is not underexposed while it works the order. A relative-value spread that is cheap to hold in perpetuals and expensive to hold in spot is held where it is cheap. An event the book has priced can be expressed in the asset most sensitive to it. In each case the perpetual is chosen because it is the most liquid and cheapest way to hold the exposure, not because it offers leverage.

Sizing from the loss, not the margin

The venue will lend far more than the desk will use. Position size is set backwards from two numbers: the loss the desk is prepared to take if the view is wrong, and the distance to liquidation that must remain after the move that would produce it. The smaller of the two sizes wins. Margin requirements are a floor set by the venue; the desk’s own limit is always well inside it.

liquidation pricethe venue closes the position herereduce sizeadd marginentrysize chosen so this gap survives the movedistance to liquidationmonitored continuously; the buffers act before the venue doesprice moving against the position →
Size is chosen so the gap between entry and liquidation survives the move that would prove the view wrong, with buffers that reduce size or add margin before the venue acts.

Margin in the right asset

Margin is held in stablecoins rather than in the asset being traded, so that a fall in the asset does not shrink the collateral at the same time as it hurts the position. Where a venue allows cross-margin, the desk decides deliberately whether a position shares collateral with the rest of the account or stands alone, because cross-margin lets a winning position support a losing one and also lets one bad position take the account with it.

Funding as a cost of the view

A long perpetual pays funding when the crowd is long, which is usually when the desk is trying to add exposure. That payment is a real cost of holding the view and is tracked against it, so that a position which is right on direction and wrong on carry is recognized as such. Where the same exposure can be held in a dated future at a better implied rate, it is, and the choice between them is part of the trade.

Exits decided in advance

Every added exposure carries three exits written down at entry: the level at which the view is wrong and the position is closed, the level or the date at which the view has paid and the exposure is rolled into spot or closed, and the liquidation distance at which size is reduced regardless of view. Liquidation management runs on top of all three, but the aim is that it never has to act.

Practice

How Wesvel approaches it

  • 01Exposure is added in perpetuals only where they are the cheapest and most liquid way to hold the view, and the reason is recorded.
  • 02Size is set from the loss the desk will accept and the liquidation distance that must remain, whichever is smaller.
  • 03Margin is held in stablecoins; the choice of cross or isolated margin is made per position.
  • 04Funding paid is tracked as a cost of the view; exits for wrong, right and too-close are set at entry.